A Tool for Exploring Plausible, Probable, Possible and Preferred Futures

Article
February 24, 2021

By: Jason Swanson

The future has the potential to unfold in many ways and exploring those possibilities can be overwhelming. The cone of plausibility is one tool that can help guide those explorations. It was first created in 1988 to help explore geopolitical scenarios, but what makes this tool especially useful is that it can be used to explore a variety of topics, including the future of learning.

The future has the potential to unfold in many ways and exploring those possibilities can be overwhelming; the cone of plausibility is one tool that can help guide those explorations.

The future is not a fixed point, and in fact there are many types of futures. When we think about a range of futures, we can organize them into four categories:

  • Plausible futures: Possibilities that could happen given the bounds of uncertainty
  • Probable futures: Scenarios and possibilities that are likely to happen
  • Possible futures: The widest range of scenarios, including all possibilities
  • Preferred future: The vision we have for possibilities we want to see come true

Plausible and possible futures deal with inbound change. They are based on actions and causes that have already occurred. Preferable futures describe what we want to happen and how we are going to respond to inbound change. They are based on our values rather than our assumptions.

Thinking through multiple futures of learning is something KnowledgeWorks does regularly. That practice is essential for establishing a vision for a preferred future. Tools such as the cone of plausibility help us organize scenarios, discuss possibilities and establish a vision for what we want for the future of learning. KnowledgeWorks’ hope is learning will become human-centered as stakeholders work to transform education systems.

Watch a video to learn more about the cone of plausibility:

THE AUTHOR

Jason Swanson
Senior Director of Strategic Foresight

Related Resources

Technology is a tool, but teachers are the key to personalized learning. We answer some questions and address misconceptions.

Matt Williams
Executive Vice President and Chief Strategy Officer

Educators across the country share some positive and negative forces affecting the personalized learning journey.

Abbie Forbus Everett
Director of Teaching and Learning

Student voices are too often absent in the decisions of organizations advocating for student-centered learning models. Let’s change that.

Menu

Search