As the number of schools, districts and states committed to student-centered, personalized learning practices grows, so does the evidence base. On this page, you’ll find an evolving library of data points that describe the impacts of student-centered and competency-based approaches on student learning and other key outcomes.
The findings are searchable and are sourced from research studies, external evaluations and evidence collected directly by schools, districts and states using student-centered and personalized learning approaches.
Submit data from your research study, district or school. Contact us.
In comparing students’ content gaps to MAP gains, schools with a smaller content gap — those where math lessons better matched students’ actual performance levels (as opposed to their grade-levels) tended to see greater gains.
Performance in schools with accountability systems that focused on state grade-level proficiency grew 7 percentile points, while those that operated under accountability systems that rewarded student growth (and prioritized individual student needs) grew 38 percentile points.
A fellowship of RI teachers determined crucial components for the successful implementation of high-quality curriculum and personalized learning practices. The fundamentals are 1) Content is key, 2) Center students, 3) Check bias, 4) Embody respect and 5) Tend to teachers
According to research report findings from City Year, prioritizing trust and strong relationships is the foundation for successful personalization.
According to a City Year research report, AmeriCorps members leaning into the practice of building strong developmental relationships was critical for maintaining student engagement.
Project-Based Learning led to a 63% gain in social studies for students in low-income schools as compared with students in higher-income schools. That translates to five to six months of increased learning for the year.
On average, third graders in project-based classrooms performed eight percentage points better on the science assessment as compared with students in the control group classrooms.
Over a three-year period, a project-based science curriculum fueled gains in student engagement and outcomes. Students appeared to be more motivated and engaged in learning science and engineering, and they seemed more interactive during group work than students not participating in the curriculum.
Findings from the first year of the Knowledge in Action project-based learning approach revealed an increase in the likelihood of earning a score of three or higher on the AP U.S. Government or AP Environmental Science test by about eight percentage...
In response to various types of resistance by adults, students tried a range of strategies: seeking assistance, perseverance and ownership, speaking truth to power and peer mentoring.
Students who learned the skills of sociopolitical efficacy and critical reflection were more likely to take sociopolitical action. These findings suggest providing classroom-based leadership opportunities if we seek to foster youth’s engagement in sociopolitical action.
Implementing the student-centered instruction and assessment strategies of lesson study practices led to Latinx and Black students, both male and female, reporting an increase in feeling comfortable sharing their ideas in math class.